<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performancing Blog Extension for FireFox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on technology, marketing and entrepreneurship.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz &#187; Flock beta release</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-12311</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markiewicz &#187; Flock beta release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-12311</guid>
		<description>[...] I tried the Flock web browser several months ago and was somewhat critical of the software. For those unfamiliar with Flock, the application is a new web browser to compete with the likes of Internet Explorer and FireFox. Flock is built upon the Mozilla code, the same as FireFox. Many of the same FireFox extensions can also be used with Flock. My initial critique of Flock was why didn&#8217;t the team just make a new extension or set of extensions for FireFox. Extending from that assertion, why would an end user stop using FireFox and start using Flock when many if not most of the features promoted could be accomplished by installing some extensions? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I tried the Flock web browser several months ago and was somewhat critical of the software. For those unfamiliar with Flock, the application is a new web browser to compete with the likes of Internet Explorer and FireFox. Flock is built upon the Mozilla code, the same as FireFox. Many of the same FireFox extensions can also be used with Flock. My initial critique of Flock was why didn&#8217;t the team just make a new extension or set of extensions for FireFox. Extending from that assertion, why would an end user stop using FireFox and start using Flock when many if not most of the features promoted could be accomplished by installing some extensions? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-7469</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-7469</guid>
		<description>Just an update- the new version of Performancing now has a post to draft feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an update- the new version of Performancing now has a post to draft feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-6800</guid>
		<description>Lloyd,

Your point is well taken. I overstated my point about the Performancing plugin by inplying that Flock was built around that single feature. 

I do still believe though that Flock has an uphill climb as many of the concepts emphasized by Flock are (or can be) added to Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd,</p>
<p>Your point is well taken. I overstated my point about the Performancing plugin by inplying that Flock was built around that single feature. </p>
<p>I do still believe though that Flock has an uphill climb as many of the concepts emphasized by Flock are (or can be) added to Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd D Budd</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-6664</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd D Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-6664</guid>
		<description>Uh no we, Flock, did not "built an entirely new browser based on this concept." We are at the beginning of building "a new browser" (Firefox at its core) around the concept of a consistent, complete user experience for the emerging participation Web.

Seasons greetings,
Lloyd D Budd
Flock QA (Qommunity and quality Assurance)
http://flock.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh no we, Flock, did not &#8220;built an entirely new browser based on this concept.&#8221; We are at the beginning of building &#8220;a new browser&#8221; (Firefox at its core) around the concept of a consistent, complete user experience for the emerging participation Web.</p>
<p>Seasons greetings,<br />
Lloyd D Budd<br />
Flock QA (Qommunity and quality Assurance)<br />
<a href="http://flock.com" rel="nofollow">http://flock.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-6661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-6661</guid>
		<description>I actually already use SpellBound in FireFox. It's probably one of the most useful extensions I've found yet. I initially couldn't get it working with v1.5, but now it's operating as usual. I'm still not sold on the Performancing extension yet, but with some more minor features (again I need save as draft) I can see it being a primary method of blog authoring. I currently use the native WordPress editor and with SpellBound, I have everything I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually already use SpellBound in FireFox. It&#8217;s probably one of the most useful extensions I&#8217;ve found yet. I initially couldn&#8217;t get it working with v1.5, but now it&#8217;s operating as usual. I&#8217;m still not sold on the Performancing extension yet, but with some more minor features (again I need save as draft) I can see it being a primary method of blog authoring. I currently use the native WordPress editor and with SpellBound, I have everything I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/performancing-blog-extension-for-firefox/#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmarkiewicz.com/?p=197#comment-6634</guid>
		<description>Need spellchecking? The latest development build of &lt;a href="http://spellbound.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;SpellBound&lt;/a&gt; integrates seamlessly with this blogging tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need spellchecking? The latest development build of <a href="http://spellbound.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">SpellBound</a> integrates seamlessly with this blogging tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
